000			nam a22 7a 4500
999			_c6456 _d6456
001			6456
003			ES-MaCNC
005			20200227083105.0
008			190124s2018 -uk ||||r|||| 000 0 eng d
020			_a9781789151053
040			_cES-MaCNC _aES-MaCNC
245	0	4	_aThe guide to merger remedies
260			_aLondon _bLaw Business Research _c2018
300			_a269 p. _c25 cm.
336			_2isbdcontent _aTexto (visual)
337			_2isbdmedia _asin mediación
490	1		_aGlobal Competition Review (GCR) Insight
500			_aAutores: Ilene Knable Gotts, Mary T. Coleman, David A. Weiskopf, Diana L. Moss, Michael A. Gleason, Lauren Miller Forbes, Dehmeh Smith, Kevin J. Arquit, Carrie C. Mahan, Christine A. Varney, Julie A. North, Margaret Segall D’Amico, Molly M. Jamison, John Harkrider, Michael O’Mara, Steven L Holley, Dustin F Guzior, David Higbee, Djordje Petkoski, Geert Goeteyn, Özlem Fidanboylu, Stephanie Greco, Aleksandra Petkovic, Caroline Préel, Justin Menezes, Juan A. Arteaga, Daniel P. Ducore, Francisco Enrique González-Díaz and Daniel P. Culley, Marcio Soares, Renata Zuccolo, Paula Camara, Jason Gudofsky, Debbie Salzberger, Kate McNeece, Yao Feng, Angus Xie, John Handoll, Shweta Shroff Chopra, Aparna Mehra, Vassili Moussis, Yoshiharu Usuki, Fernando Carreño, Paloma Alcántara Editores: Ronan P Harty and Nathan Kiratzis
520			_aA feature common among almost all jurisdictions that have antitrust laws is a set of rules that govern mergers. Although the details of these rules may differ, a unifying theme is that mergers should not reduce competition in a properly defined market. The assessment of the competitive effects of any given transaction is not a binary exercise. Ultimately, the assessment of the impact of the transaction turns on an informed, but prospective, review of the relevant market and the competitive conditions in that market. Often, antitrust authorities will agree to remedy the prospective harm that may result from a transaction by accepting undertakings or commitments from the parties to do particular things or act in a particular way. At this point, an additional level of ‘crystal ball gazing’ is introduced into the merger review process. The antitrust authority needs to determine an appropriate means of addressing the prospective harm arising from the merger, otherwise known as a merger remedy. This book provides a comprehensive review of a variety of issues relating to the design and implementation of merger remedies, often referring to practices and precedents from the United States and the European Union. However, as noted above, merger rules are global in nature and, therefore, a part of the book is devoted to a review of other jurisdictions around the world, including Canada, China and Mexico.
650		4	_9203 _aCompetencia
650		4	_91079 _aRegulación
650		4	_9356 _aDerecho de la competencia
650		7	_9589 _aFusiones y adquisiciones
653		0	_aConcentración de empresas
653		0	_aRemedios
653		0	_aPrácticas anticompetitivas
653		0	_aCumplimiento normativo (Compliance)
653		0	_aDefensa de la competencia
653		0	_aAntitrust
653		0	_aControl de concentraciones
700	1		_aHarty E., Ronan P. _eed. lit. _97411
700	1		_aKiratzis, Nathan _eed. lit. _97320
830		0	_aGlobal Competition Review (GCR) Insight _97349
856	4	1	_uhttp://bibliotecacnmc.bage.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=a1a30e03e59898ceba57c69b76643997 _zVer índice
942			_2udc _cMON