000			01375nam a2200373Ki 4500
999			_c6506 _d6506
001			6506
003			ES-MaCNC
005			20200820164936.0
008			200326s2019 maua 000 0 eng d
020			_a9781950769414
040			_aES-MaCNC _cES-MaCNC
100	1		_aEvans, David S. _96865
245	1	0	_aAntitrust analysis of platform markets: why the Supreme Court got it right in American Express
260			_aBoston _bCompetition Policy International (CPI) _c2019
300			_a213 p. _c25 cm.
336			_2isbdcontent _aTexto (visual)
337			_2isbdmedia _asin mediación
520			_aThis book explores the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Ohio et al. v. American Express, and the preceding litigation, for the treatment of multisided platforms under U.S. antitrust law. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision. It is based on a series of articles that the authors wrote (either jointly or individually), leading up to and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision. The authors consider that the Supreme Court ruling provides valuable guidance for antitrust analysis in such markets. This book emphasizes the importance for enforcers and the judiciary to take full account of the multisided nature of certain markets, not only in payment services, but throughout the economy (including other types of multisided platforms, which are particularly common in online digital markets).
650		4	_aCompetencia _9203
650		4	_aDerecho de la competencia _9356
650		0	_aEconomia digital _97243
653		0	_aAntitrust
653		0	_aPlataformas digitales
653		0	_aDefensa de la competencia
653		0	_aAmerican Express
653		0	_aJurisprudencia
700	1		_aSchmalensee, Richard _96866
942			_2udc _cMON