000			nam a22 7a 4500
999			_c6625 _d6625
001			6625
003			ES-MaCNC
005			20240124133640.0
007			ta
008			230727s2023 nyu |r 000 0 eng
020			_a9781954750135
040			_cES-MaCNC
100	1		_aBai, Xue _97708
245	1	0	_aReform of Chinese state-owned enterprises : _bwhat China can learn from the practice of competitive neutrality policy in Australia /
260			_aNew York: _bInstitute de Droit de la Concurrence _c2023
300			_a312 p.; _c24 cm.
336			_2isbdcontent _aTexto (visual)
337			_2isbdmedia _asin mediación
490	1		_aConcurrences: Competition Law Review
520			_aThe research is an examination of the question of whether China, with a substantial number of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) active in the market, can effectively maintain a level playing field through the existing competition law and policy framework and, if not, what strategies it could adopt to address this problem. The book takes the position that the current competition law and policy in China has limited effect in ensuring a level playing field between SOEs and non-SOEs. To be clear, the book does not suggest that the existing Chinese competition law (the Anti-Monopoly Law 'AML') and competition policy completely fail to address competition concerns caused by Chinese SOEs; on the contrary, there are cases that suggest that SOEs, like all the other market players, are under the scrutiny of the AML and will continue to be so in the future. Chinese competition policy is developing into a more comprehensive policy, and the newly established Fair Competition Review System ('FCRS') potentially addresses one aspect of competitive neutrality concerns caused by SOEs, the regulatory advantages of SOEs. Collectively, the book argues that the application of AML and the FCRS cannot address all aspects of competitive neutrality concerns caused by SOEs, leaving the issue of lack of a level playing field between SOEs and non-SOEs unaddressed in China's market. Given the current reform of SOEs has increased pressure upon Chinese SOEs to be more competitive, this book argues that it is a good time for China to reconsider how to ensure competition between SOEs and non-SOEs is based on efficiency, rather than on who can benefit from government ownership and political connections. The book also provides recommendations on how to draft a Chinese competitive neutrality policy that could accommodate China's distinctive political and economic circumstances. The proposed measures, if adopted, would provide stronger domestic competition, and would help Chinese SOEs to be more competitive in the market. <br><br> <b>TABLE OF CONTENTS</b> <br><br> Introduction <br> Foreword <br> <br>Chapter 1<br> Introduction <br>Chapter 2<br> Background Context and Definitions <br>Chapter 3<br> Understanding the Reform of SOEs in China <br>Chapter 4<br> A Comparative Analysis of Australia’s Responses to the Competitive Neutrality Problems Caused by SOEs <br>Chapter 5<br> Preliminary Analysis of Competitive Neutrality Concerns in China <br>Chapter 6<br> A Critical Evaluation of China’s Response to the Lack of Competitive Neutrality in the Market <br>Chapter 7<br> Implementation of Competitive Neutrality Policy in Australia <br>Chapter 8<br> Make Competitive Neutrality Happening in the Chinese Legal System <br>Chapter 9<br> Conclusion
650		4	_9203 _aCompetencia
650		4	_9332 _aDerecho
650		4	_9356 _aDerecho de la competencia
650		4	_aEmpresa _9486
650		4	_aAdministración pública _927
650		4	_aRegulación _91079
653		0	_aEmpresas de servicio público
653		0	_aAntitrust
653		0	_aDefensa de la competencia
653		0	_aPrácticas anticompetitivas
653		0	_aNeutralidad competitiva
653		0	_aEmpresa pública
653		0	_aEmpresa privada
700	1		_aHealey, Deborah J. _eprol. _97709
700	1		_aSteenbergen, Jacques _eintrod. _97710
830		0	_3Concurrences: Competition Law Review
856	4	1	_uhttp://bibliotecacnmc.bage.es/cgi-bin/koha/opac-retrieve-file.pl?id=c14d22f5251ca5158ef4912c47d2ca3b _zVer índice
856	4	1	_uhttps://www.concurrences.com/en/all-books/reform-of-chinese-state-owned-enterprises _zVer ebook
942			_2udc _cMON